January 27, 2026

Braided Learning:Strengthening What Already Works

Braided Learning:  Strengthening What Already Works


Across classrooms, coaching cycles, and leadership meetings, we're hearing a similar tension surface: AI is everywhere—and yet we are still trying to figure out where it actually belongs. We know not as a replacement for professional judgment. And not as another initiative to manage. But a tool that can strengthen reflection, planning, and clarity in service of more vibrant learning experiences. Without flattening the human side of teaching and learning.



That tension is captured beautifully in the Getting Smart article, “Braided Learning: How AI Can Enhance What Educators Already Do Well”. The author offers a powerful metaphor: instead of treating AI as a separate strand—or worse, a shortcut—we can braid it alongside educator expertise, relationships, and lived experience. In this view, AI supports the work teachers and leaders are already doing: noticing patterns, drafting ideas, asking better questions, and making sense of complex information, while humans remain firmly in charge of meaning, values, and decisions. That stance closely mirrors our core belief at elevatED: transformation happens when tools amplify human judgment, learner experience, and community values, not when they replace them. It's also what we're seeing in the field: educators don't want more tools; they want tools that strengthen the work they already trust.


From Braided Thinking to Intentional Action


What we appreciate most from the article highlighted above, is it doesn't offer a silver bullet. Instead, it invites educators to ask questions: What work do we want humans to hold tightly? Where could AI reduce friction or surface insight? How do we design conditions where the braid strengthens, rather than tangles? 


These are the same questions we ask when designing for vibrant, learner-centered experiences—and the ones we believe are worth slowing down for.

How teams might use this article:

  • In a PLC:Use the article as a shared read and invite teams to highlight one passage that affirmed their instincts and one that challenged their thinking. Pair that with the question: Where could AI support reflection or planning without touching the heart of our instruction?
  • With coaches:Read the article through a coaching lens and ask: Which parts of our coaching work should never be automated? Where might AI support prep, sense-making, or follow-up without replacing conversation?
  • With school or district leaders:Use the braided learning metaphor to ground AI conversations in enabling conditions. Ask: What policies, norms, or supports would help educators use AI as a partner—not a pressure? What guardrails matter most?
  • 

One tool that can support these conversations is our AI Braiding Protocol, a short, reflective process that helps educators start with the work they already do, notice where friction exists, and explore one small way AI might support thinking—while keeping learner experience, equity, and human judgment at the center.

When adult learning is personal, learner-owned, collaborative, and grounded in the real world, tools like AI don't lead the work, they quietly strengthen it.


Your Spring Learning Flight Plan


✈️ Designing Defenses of Learning


February 18 | 9:00–3:00

Back by popular demand! Every student has a learning story worth telling. This design session supports teachers, coaches, and leaders in creating or refining Defenses of Learning that center growth, reflection, and student voice. Through inspiring examples, exploration of common pain points, and digging into 50+ tools and strategies, you'll leave with ideas and resources to make your Defenses of Learning impactful for your entire school/ district community.
🔗 
sign up here



✈️ The Communication & Collaboration Playbook


March 12 | 9:00–3:00

The two skills most commonly included in Portraits of a Learner AND on job descriptions: communication and collaboration. But, what does it really mean to bring those skills to life in classrooms? This session explores practical strategies and simple shifts found in our Profile Playbook that help make these skills daily habits. With or without a learner profile, participants will leave with tools that empower students to take ownership and collaborate with purpose.
🔗 
sign up here


✈️ Learning Opportunity with Our Friends at NGLC


April 9–10, 2026 | Portland, Maine
Next Generation Learning Challenges invites educators to a 
Learning Excursion to Casco Bay High School, focused on rigor, relevance, and relationships in innovative instruction and proficiency-based grading. Participants will experience student-led, community-connected learning in action and take home bold yet practical ideas. Early bird pricing is available through February 1, with additional discounts through March 1.
🔗 Learn more & register: 
https://nglc-2026.eventbrite.com


By Lacey Eckels April 2, 2026
Schools have named durable skills like communication and collaboration, but struggle to teach them intentionally. Schools that succeed make skills visible, embed them into daily learning, and apply them in real-world contexts. The core message is clear: durable skills are built through intentional, everyday design.
By Lacey Eckels March 17, 2026
What does it look like when a student’s Defense of Learning truly embodies a district’s Profile of a Learner? This 11-year-old’s compelling TED-style talk offers a powerful example. The format might not be what many of us expect in a traditional defense, yet the Portrait competencies are unmistakably present. Communication is evident in his pacing, tone, eye contact, and ability to connect with the audience. Collaboration surfaces as he references mentors and teammates who shaped his journey. Critical thinking appears in the way he interprets experiences and draws lessons from them. Problem-solving emerges through stories of obstacles, setbacks, and growth. The competencies aren’t listed on a slide. They are visible in the delivery. From Sorting Evidence to Synthesizing Growth Many student defenses are structured competency by competency: “Here is my artifact. Here is how it shows I am an effective communicator.” This approach provides clarity and helpful scaffolding, especially as districts begin Portrait work. Over time, however, the structure can unintentionally shift the focus from growth to compliance. The TED-style defense offers a different approach. Instead of sorting artifacts into categories, the student synthesized experiences into a cohesive narrative. He reflected on meaningful moments, described growth over time, connected experiences to identity, and communicated his story clearly to an authentic audience. Rather than organizing artifacts, he was articulating who he is becoming. A Design Question for Leaders What if the defense itself became the demonstration of Profile competencies?  In other words, what if the most powerful defenses were those in which students embody communication, critical thinking, collaboration, and problem-solving through the way they share their learning—making the competencies visible in action, not just in explanation?
By Lacey Eckels March 3, 2026
Start with purpose when designing Defenses of Learning. Discover how clarity transforms these experiences from compliance-driven tasks into meaningful opportunities for student reflection, growth, and authentic demonstration of learning.
Show More
By Lacey Eckels April 2, 2026
Schools have named durable skills like communication and collaboration, but struggle to teach them intentionally. Schools that succeed make skills visible, embed them into daily learning, and apply them in real-world contexts. The core message is clear: durable skills are built through intentional, everyday design.
By Lacey Eckels March 17, 2026
What does it look like when a student’s Defense of Learning truly embodies a district’s Profile of a Learner? This 11-year-old’s compelling TED-style talk offers a powerful example. The format might not be what many of us expect in a traditional defense, yet the Portrait competencies are unmistakably present. Communication is evident in his pacing, tone, eye contact, and ability to connect with the audience. Collaboration surfaces as he references mentors and teammates who shaped his journey. Critical thinking appears in the way he interprets experiences and draws lessons from them. Problem-solving emerges through stories of obstacles, setbacks, and growth. The competencies aren’t listed on a slide. They are visible in the delivery. From Sorting Evidence to Synthesizing Growth Many student defenses are structured competency by competency: “Here is my artifact. Here is how it shows I am an effective communicator.” This approach provides clarity and helpful scaffolding, especially as districts begin Portrait work. Over time, however, the structure can unintentionally shift the focus from growth to compliance. The TED-style defense offers a different approach. Instead of sorting artifacts into categories, the student synthesized experiences into a cohesive narrative. He reflected on meaningful moments, described growth over time, connected experiences to identity, and communicated his story clearly to an authentic audience. Rather than organizing artifacts, he was articulating who he is becoming. A Design Question for Leaders What if the defense itself became the demonstration of Profile competencies?  In other words, what if the most powerful defenses were those in which students embody communication, critical thinking, collaboration, and problem-solving through the way they share their learning—making the competencies visible in action, not just in explanation?
By Lacey Eckels March 3, 2026
Start with purpose when designing Defenses of Learning. Discover how clarity transforms these experiences from compliance-driven tasks into meaningful opportunities for student reflection, growth, and authentic demonstration of learning.
Show More


Share this article